From de69e2455102bbeffbadfa7a3a4192036aa72d6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trung Nguyen <ndactrung@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:05:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Added replies to Steve's questions --- doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polygon.txt | 8 +++++--- doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polyhedron.txt | 10 +++++++--- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polygon.txt b/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polygon.txt index b4135a4065..ea77fa9247 100644 --- a/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polygon.txt +++ b/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polygon.txt @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ cohesive interactions? If so, this should be explained up above. But an additional confusion is that the specied cutoff (Rc in diagram?) is a single number, but depedning on the orientiation of the 2 particles they might have a suface/surface overlap at a much -smaller value of Ri + Rj. So what is Rc then? +smaller value of Ri + Rj. So what is Rc then? - I added +the following paragraph to address this. Note that F_n and F_t are functions of the surface separation \delta_n = d - (R_i + R_j). @@ -100,8 +101,9 @@ k_n (energy/distance^2 units) k_na (energy/distance^2 units) :ul Effectively, k_n and k_na are the slopes of the red lines in the plot -above for force versus distance, for r < 0 and 0 < r < rc -respectively. TRUNG: is this sentence correct? +above for force versus surface separation, for \delta_n < 0 and 0 < \delta_n < r_c +respectively. (TRUNG: is this sentence correct? - it should read delta_n, +instead of r) TRUNG: reminder to copy any change in this file to the pair polyhedron file as well (and vice versa) diff --git a/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polyhedron.txt b/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polyhedron.txt index 3f0a2403d0..cb4ec00917 100644 --- a/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polyhedron.txt +++ b/doc/src/pair_body_rounded_polyhedron.txt @@ -46,7 +46,10 @@ this paragraph would make more sense in the body.txt file about how to create a model that includes non-body particles (spheres). And in this pair style file just a couple lines about which part of the interactions this pair style computes. Ditto in the pair body polygon -file. +file. - The pair style supports body/sphere and sphere/sphere +given that all the atoms should be of body rounded/polyhedron. +I updated the above paragraph and added examples in body.txt for +specifying the special objects (i.e. spheres and rods). This pairwise interaction between the rounded polyhedra is described in "Wang"_#Wang, where a polyhedron does not have sharp corners and @@ -94,8 +97,9 @@ k_n (energy/distance^2 units) k_na (energy/distance^2 units) :ul Effectively, k_n and k_na are the slopes of the red lines in the plot -above for force versus distance, for r < 0 and 0 < r < rc -respectively. TRUNG: is this sentence correct? +above for force versus surface separation, for \delta_n < 0 and 0 < \delta_n < r_c +respectively. (TRUNG: is this sentence correct? - it should read delta_n, +instead of r) [Mixing, shift, table, tail correction, restart, rRESPA info]: -- GitLab