diff --git a/tex/bounds-on-semistabilisers.tex b/tex/bounds-on-semistabilisers.tex
index 30b8bfe73738c9def660fa4a0a18e4ed4420e4e2..d8d7366c03629cca32b27a749238c58e25da5d55 100644
--- a/tex/bounds-on-semistabilisers.tex
+++ b/tex/bounds-on-semistabilisers.tex
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-\section{B.Schmidt's Solutions to the Problems}
-
-\subsection{Bound on \texorpdfstring{$\chern_0(u)$}{ch0(u)} for Semistabilizers}
+\section{Existing Bound on Semistabiliser Ranks}
 \label{subsect:loose-bound-on-r}
 
 The proof for the following Theorem \ref{thm:loose-bound-on-r} was hinted at in
@@ -8,23 +6,28 @@ The proof for the following Theorem \ref{thm:loose-bound-on-r} was hinted at in
 \cite{SchmidtGithub2020}. The latter reference is a SageMath \cite{sagemath}
 library for computing certain quantities related to Bridgeland stabilities on
 Picard rank 1 varieties. It also includes functions to compute pseudo-walls and
-pseudo-semistabilizers for tilt stability.
+pseudo-semistabilisers for tilt stability.
 
 
 \begin{theorem}[Bound on $r$ - Benjamin Schmidt]
 \label{thm:loose-bound-on-r}
-Given a Chern character $v$ such that $\beta_-\coloneqq\beta_{-}(v)\in\QQ$, the rank $r$ of
-any semistabilizer $E$ of some $F \in \firsttilt{\beta_-}$ with $\chern(F)=v$ is
+Given a Chern character $v$ with $\Delta(v) \geq 0$ and positive rank (or
+$\chern_0(v) = 0$ but $\chern_1(v) > 0$)
+such that
+$\beta_-\coloneqq\beta_{-}(v)\in\QQ$, the rank $r$ of
+any solution $u$ of Problem \ref{problem:problem-statement-2} is
 bounded above by:
 
 \begin{equation*}
-	r \leq \frac{mn^2 \chern^{\beta_-}_1(v)^2}{\gcd(m,2n^2)}
+	r \leq \frac{m\left(n \chern^{\beta_-}_1(v) - 1\right)^2}{\gcd(m,2n^2)}
 \end{equation*}
 \end{theorem}
 
 \begin{proof}
 The Bogomolov form applied to the twisted Chern character is the same as the
-normal one. So $0 \leq \Delta(E)$ yields:
+untwisted one. So $0 \leq \Delta(E)$
+(condition 2 from Corollary \ref{cor:num_test_prob2})
+yields:
 
 \begin{equation}
 	\label{eqn-bgmlv-on-E}
@@ -32,7 +35,9 @@ normal one. So $0 \leq \Delta(E)$ yields:
 \end{equation}
 
 \noindent
-Furthermore, $E \hookrightarrow F$ in $\firsttilt{\beta_{-}}$ gives:
+Furthermore,
+condition 5 from Corollary \ref{cor:num_test_prob2}
+gives:
 \begin{equation}
 	\label{eqn-tilt-cat-cond}
 	0 \leq \chern^\beta_1(E) \leq \chern^\beta_1(F)
@@ -58,8 +63,27 @@ bound for the rank of $E$:
 	\chern_0(E) &= \chern^{\beta_-}_0(E) \\
 	&\leq \frac{\lcm(m,2n^2) \chern^{\beta_-}_1(E)^2}{2} \\
 	&= \frac{mn^2 \chern^{\beta_-}_1(F)^2}{\gcd(m,2n^2)}
+	\label{proof:first-bound-on-r}
 \end{align}
 
+In fact Equation \ref{eqn-tilt-cat-cond} can be tightened slightly:
+we cannot have equality $\chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(E) = \chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(F)$
+otherwise we would have $\chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(G)=0$ for the quotient $G$.
+This would imply $\mu(G)=\beta_{-}$, but since $\Theta_G$ is bounded above in the
+upper-half plane by the assymptotes crossing the $\beta$-axis at 45$^\circ$ at
+$\beta=\beta_{-}(v)$. So $\Theta_G$ cannot intersect $\Theta_v$ at any point
+with $\alpha > 0$, so there is no point with $\nu(E)=\nu(F)=\nu(G)=0$, which would
+have to hold at the top of the pseudo-wall if it were to exist.
+Therefore we must have a strict inequality
+$\chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(E) < \chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(F)$,
+and since these are elements of $\frac{1}{n}\ZZ$, we can also conclude:
+\[
+	n\chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(E) \leq n\chern^{\beta_{-}}_1(F) - 1
+\]
+which then tightens the upper bound found for $\chern_0(E)$
+in Equation \ref{proof:first-bound-on-r}
+to the bound in the statement of the Lemma.
+
 \end{proof}
 
 \begin{sagesilent}
@@ -74,8 +98,8 @@ giving $n=\sage{recurring.n}$ and
 $\chern_1^{\sage{recurring.betaminus}}(F) = \sage{recurring.twisted.ch[1]}$.
 
 Using the above Theorem \ref{thm:loose-bound-on-r}, we get that the ranks of
-tilt semistabilizers for $v$ are bounded above by $\sage{recurring.loose_bound}$.
-However, when computing all tilt semistabilizers for $v$ on $\PP^2$, the maximum
+tilt semistabilisers for $v$ are bounded above by $\sage{recurring.loose_bound}$.
+However, when computing all tilt semistabilisers for $v$ on $\PP^2$, the maximum
 rank that appears turns out to be 25. This will be a recurring example to
 illustrate the performance of later Theorems about rank bounds
 \end{example}
@@ -92,8 +116,8 @@ giving $n=\sage{extravagant.n}$ and
 $\chern_1^{\sage{extravagant.betaminus}}(F) = \sage{extravagant.twisted.ch[1]}$.
 
 Using the above Theorem \ref{thm:loose-bound-on-r}, we get that the ranks of
-tilt semistabilizers for $v$ are bounded above by $\sage{extravagant.loose_bound}$.
-However, when computing all tilt semistabilizers for $v$ on $\PP^2$, the maximum
+tilt semistabilisers for $v$ are bounded above by $\sage{extravagant.loose_bound}$.
+However, when computing all tilt semistabilisers for $v$ on $\PP^2$, the maximum
 rank that appears turns out to be $\sage{extravagant.actual_rmax}$.
 \end{example}
 
@@ -101,7 +125,7 @@ rank that appears turns out to be $\sage{extravagant.actual_rmax}$.
 \section{Tighter Bounds}
 \label{sec:refinement}
 
-To get tighter bounds on the rank of destabilizers $E$ of some $F$ with some
+To get tighter bounds on the rank of destabilisers $E$ of some $F$ with some
 fixed Chern character, we will need to consider each of the values which
 $\chern_1^{\beta}(E)$ can take.
 Doing this will allow us to eliminate possible values of $\chern_0(E)$ for which
@@ -111,7 +135,7 @@ corresponding $\chern_1^{\beta}(E)$ fail one of the inequalities (which is what
 was implicitly happening before).
 
 
-First, let us fix a Chern character for $F$, and some pseudo-semistabilizer
+First, let us fix a Chern character for $F$, and some pseudo-semistabiliser
 $u$ which is a solution to problem
 \ref{problem:problem-statement-1} or
 \ref{problem:problem-statement-2}.
@@ -154,7 +178,7 @@ For the next subsections, we consider $q$ to be fixed with one of these values,
 and we shall be varying $\chern_0(E) = r$ to see when certain inequalities fail.
 
 
-\subsection{Numerical Inequalities}
+\subsection{Bounds on \texorpdfstring{`$d$'}{d}-values for Solutions of Problems}
 
 This section studies the numerical conditions that $u$ must satisfy as per
 lemma \ref{lem:num_test_prob1}
@@ -388,7 +412,7 @@ it is worth noting that the extreme values of $q$ in this range lead to the
 tightest bounds on $d$, as illustrated in Figure
 (\ref{fig:d_bounds_xmpl_extrm_q}).
 In fact, in each case, one of the weak upper bounds coincides with one of the
-weak lower bounds, (implying no possible destabilizers $E$ with
+weak lower bounds, (implying no possible destabilisers $E$ with
 $\chern_0(E)=\vcentcolon r>R\coloneqq\chern_0(F)$ for these $q$-values).
 This indeed happens in general since the right hand sides of
 (eqn \ref{eqn:bgmlv2_d_bound_betamin}) and
@@ -401,7 +425,7 @@ In the other case, $q=\chern^{\beta}_1(F)$, it is the right hand sides of
 The more generic case, when $0 < q\coloneqq\chern_1^{\beta}(E) < \chern_1^{\beta}(F)$
 for the bounds on $d$ in terms of $r$ is illustrated in Figure
 (\ref{fig:d_bounds_xmpl_gnrc_q}).
-The question of whether there are pseudo-destabilizers of arbitrarily large
+The question of whether there are pseudo-destabilisers of arbitrarily large
 rank, in the context of the graph, comes down to whether there are points
 $(r,d) \in \ZZ \oplus \frac{1}{\lcm(m,2)} \ZZ$ (with large $r$)
 % TODO have a proper definition for pseudo-destabilizers/walls
@@ -631,7 +655,7 @@ from plots_and_expressions import main_theorem1
 \begin{theorem}[Bound on $r$ \#1]
 \label{thm:rmax_with_uniform_eps}
 	Let $v = (R,C\ell,D\ell^2)$ be a fixed Chern character. Then the ranks of the
-	pseudo-semistabilizers for $v$,
+	pseudo-semistabilisers for $v$,
 	which are solutions to problem \ref{problem:problem-statement-2},
 	with $\chern_1^\beta = q$
 	are bounded above by the following expression.
@@ -660,7 +684,7 @@ So, if any of the two upper bounds on $d$ come to within
 $\frac{1}{\lcm(m,2n^2)}$ of this lower bound, then there are no solutions for
 $d$.
 Hence any corresponding $r$ cannot be a rank of a
-pseudo-semistabilizer for $v$.
+pseudo-semistabiliser for $v$.
 
 To avoid this, we must have,
 considering Equations
@@ -706,7 +730,7 @@ from plots_and_expressions import q_sol, bgmlv_v, psi
 \label{cor:direct_rmax_with_uniform_eps}
 	Let $v$ be a fixed Chern character and
 	$R\coloneqq\chern_0(v) \leq \frac{1}{2}\lcm(m,2n^2){\chern_1^{\beta}(F)}^2$.
-	Then the ranks of the pseudo-semistabilizers for $v$,
+	Then the ranks of the pseudo-semistabilisers for $v$,
 	which are solutions to problem \ref{problem:problem-statement-2},
 	are bounded above by the following expression.
 
@@ -716,7 +740,7 @@ from plots_and_expressions import q_sol, bgmlv_v, psi
 \end{corollary}
 
 \begin{proof}
-The ranks of the pseudo-semistabilizers for $v$ are bounded above by the
+The ranks of the pseudo-semistabilisers for $v$ are bounded above by the
 maximum over $q\in [0, \chern_1^{\beta}(F)]$ of the expression in theorem
 \ref{thm:rmax_with_uniform_eps}.
 Noticing that the expression is a maximum of two quadratic functions in $q$:
@@ -753,7 +777,7 @@ that $m=2$, $\beta=\sage{recurring.betaminus}$,
 giving $n=\sage{recurring.n}$.
 
 Using the above corollary \ref{cor:direct_rmax_with_uniform_eps}, we get that
-the ranks of tilt semistabilizers for $v$ are bounded above by
+the ranks of tilt semistabilisers for $v$ are bounded above by
 $\sage{recurring.corrolary_bound} \approx  \sage{float(recurring.corrolary_bound)}$,
 which is much closer to real maximum 25 than the original bound 144.
 \end{example}
@@ -766,7 +790,7 @@ that $m=2$, $\beta=\sage{extravagant.betaminus}$,
 giving $n=\sage{extravagant.n}$.
 
 Using the above corollary \ref{cor:direct_rmax_with_uniform_eps}, we get that
-the ranks of tilt semistabilizers for $v$ are bounded above by
+the ranks of tilt semistabilisers for $v$ are bounded above by
 $\sage{extravagant.corrolary_bound} \approx  \sage{float(extravagant.corrolary_bound)}$,
 which is much closer to real maximum $\sage{extravagant.actual_rmax}$ than the
 original bound 215296.
@@ -784,9 +808,9 @@ this value of $\frac{1}{2n^2}\ZZ$ explicitly.
 The expressions that will follow will be a bit more complicated and have more
 parts which depend on the values of $q$ and $\beta$, even their numerators
 $\aa,\bb$ specifically. The upcoming Theorem (TODO ref) is less useful as a
-`clean' formula for a bound on the ranks of the pseudo-semistabilizers, but has a
+`clean' formula for a bound on the ranks of the pseudo-semistabilisers, but has a
 purpose in the context of writing a computer program to find
-pseudo-semistabilizers. Such a program would iterate through possible values of
+pseudo-semistabilisers. Such a program would iterate through possible values of
 $q$, then iterate through values of $r$ within the bounds (dependent on $q$),
 which would then determine $c$, and then find the corresponding possible values
 for $d$.
@@ -928,7 +952,7 @@ from plots_and_expressions import main_theorem2
 \label{thm:rmax_with_eps1}
 	Let $v$ be a fixed Chern character, with $\frac{a_v}{n}=\beta\coloneqq\beta(v)$
 	rational and expressed in lowest terms.
-	Then the ranks $r$ of the pseudo-semistabilizers $u$ for $v$ with,
+	Then the ranks $r$ of the pseudo-semistabilisers $u$ for $v$ with,
 	which are solutions to problem \ref{problem:problem-statement-2},
 	$\chern_1^\beta(u) = q = \frac{b_q}{n}$
 	are bounded above by the following expression:
@@ -959,7 +983,7 @@ from plots_and_expressions import main_theorem2_corollary
 	(or any other surfaces with $m=1$ or $2$).
 	Let $v$ be a fixed Chern character, with $\frac{a_v}{n}=\beta\coloneqq\beta(v)$
 	rational and expressed in lowest terms.
-	Then the ranks $r$ of the pseudo-semistabilizers $u$ for $v$ with,
+	Then the ranks $r$ of the pseudo-semistabilisers $u$ for $v$ with,
 	which are solutions to problem \ref{problem:problem-statement-2},
 	$\chern_1^\beta(u) = q = \frac{b_q}{n}$
 	are bounded above by the following expression:
@@ -997,7 +1021,7 @@ take $\ell=c_1(\mathcal{O}(1))$ as the standard polarization on $\PP^2$, so that
 $\beta=\sage{recurring.betaminus}$, giving $n=\sage{recurring.n}$
 and $\chern_1^{\sage{recurring.betaminus}}(F) = \sage{recurring.twisted.ch[1]}$.
 %% TODO transcode notebook code
-The (non-exclusive) upper bounds for $r\coloneqq\chern_0(u)$ of a tilt semistabilizer $u$ of $v$
+The (non-exclusive) upper bounds for $r\coloneqq\chern_0(u)$ of a tilt semistabiliser $u$ of $v$
 in terms of the possible values for $q\coloneqq\chern_1^{\beta}(u)$ are as follows:
 
 \begin{sagesilent}
@@ -1032,7 +1056,7 @@ end}
 \noindent
 It's worth noting that the bounds given by Theorem \ref{thm:rmax_with_eps1}
 reach, but do not exceed the actual maximum rank 25 of the
-pseudo-semistabilizers of $v$ in this case.
+pseudo-semistabilisers of $v$ in this case.
 As a reminder, the original loose bound from Theorem \ref{thm:loose-bound-on-r}
 was 144.
 
@@ -1050,7 +1074,7 @@ possible values for $k_{v,q}$, in dfn/Lemma \ref{lemdfn:epsilon_q}. This allows
 for a larger possible difference between the bounds given by Theorems
 \ref{thm:rmax_with_uniform_eps} and \ref{thm:rmax_with_eps1}, with the bound
 from the second being up to $\sage{n}$ times smaller, for any given $q$ value.
-The (non-exclusive) upper bounds for $r\coloneqq\chern_0(u)$ of a tilt semistabilizer $u$ of $v$
+The (non-exclusive) upper bounds for $r\coloneqq\chern_0(u)$ of a tilt semistabiliser $u$ of $v$
 in terms of the first few smallest possible values for $q\coloneqq\chern_1^{\beta}(u)$ are as follows:
 
 \begin{sagesilent}