Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
L
lammps
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
multiscale
lammps
Commits
fcf9607a
Commit
fcf9607a
authored
7 years ago
by
Max Veit
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Update USER_QUIP docs to clarify use of "special_bonds"
parent
17aff29f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/src/pair_quip.txt
+8
-0
8 additions, 0 deletions
doc/src/pair_quip.txt
with
8 additions
and
0 deletions
doc/src/pair_quip.txt
+
8
−
0
View file @
fcf9607a
...
...
@@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ LAMMPS"_Section_start.html#start_3 section for more info.
QUIP potentials are parametrized in electron-volts and Angstroms and
therefore should be used with LAMMPS metal "units"_units.html.
QUIP potentials are generally not designed to work with the scaling
factors set by the "special_bonds"_special_bonds.html command. The
recommended setting in molecular systems is to include all
interactions, i.e. to use {special_bonds lj 1.0 1.0 1.0}. The only
exception to this rule is if you know that your QUIP potential needs
to exclude bonded, 1-3, or 1-4 interactions and does not already do
this exclusion within QUIP.
[Related commands:]
"pair_coeff"_pair_coeff.html
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment