Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
M
Max Destabilizer Rank
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
luke naylor latex documents
research
Max Destabilizer Rank
Commits
90dd4611
Commit
90dd4611
authored
1 year ago
by
Luke Naylor
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Justify parts of first problem
parent
dec87274
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
main.tex
+25
-5
25 additions, 5 deletions
main.tex
with
25 additions
and
5 deletions
main.tex
+
25
−
5
View file @
90dd4611
...
...
@@ -562,16 +562,36 @@ are trying to solve for.
Fix a Chern character
$
v
$
with positive rank,
$
\Delta
(
v
)
\geq
0
$
,
and
$
\beta
_{
-
}
(
v
)
\in
\QQ
$
.
The goal is to find all pseudo-semistabilizers
$
u
=(
r,c
\ell
,d
\ell
^
2
)
$
The goal is to find all pseudo-semistabilizers
$
u
$
which give circular pseudo-walls containing some fixed point
$
P
\in\Theta
_
v
^
-
$
.
With the added restriction that
$
u
$
`destabilizes'
$
v
$
moving `inwards', that is,
$
\nu
(
u
)
>
\nu
(
v
)
$
inside the circular pseudo-wall
(`outward' destabilizers can be recovered as
$
v
-
u
$
).
$
\nu
(
u
)
>
\nu
(
v
)
$
inside the circular pseudo-wall.
\end{problem}
This will give all pseudo-walls between the chamber corresponding to Gieseker
stability and the stability condition corresponding to
$
P
$
.
\end{problem}
The purpose of the final `direction' condition is because, up to that point,
semistabilizers are not distinguished from their corresponding quotients:
Suppose
$
E
\hookrightarrow
F
\twoheadrightarrow
G
$
, then the tilt slopes
$
\nu
_{
\alpha
,
\beta
}$
are strictly increasing, strictly decreasing, or equal across the short exact
sequence (consequence of the see-saw principle).
In this case,
$
\chern
(
E
)
$
is a pseudo-semistabilizer of
$
\chern
(
F
)
$
, if and
only if
$
\chern
(
G
)
$
is a pseudo-semistabilizer of
$
\chern
(
F
)
$
.
The numerical inequalities in the definition for pseudo-semistabilizer cannot
tell which of
$
E
$
or
$
G
$
is the subobject.
However what can be distinguished is the direction across the wall that
$
\chern
(
E
)
$
or
$
\chern
(
G
)
$
destabilizes
$
\chern
(
F
)
$
(they will each destabilize in the opposite direction to the other).
The `inwards' semistabilizers are preferred because we are moving from a
typically more familiar chamber
(the stable objects of Chern character
$
v
$
in the outside chamber will only be
Gieseker stable sheaves).
Also note that this last restriction does not remove any pseudo-walls found,
and if we do want to recover `outwards' semistabilizers, we can simply take
$
v
-
u
$
for each solution
$
u
$
of the problem.
\begin{problem}
[all `left' pseudo-walls]
\label
{
problem:problem-statement-2
}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment