Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
M
Max Destabilizer Rank
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
luke naylor latex documents
research
Max Destabilizer Rank
Commits
c9534b37
Commit
c9534b37
authored
1 year ago
by
Luke Naylor
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Improve sectioning
parent
d3629091
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#27557
passed
1 year ago
Stage: test
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
main.tex
+68
-14
68 additions, 14 deletions
main.tex
with
68 additions
and
14 deletions
main.tex
+
68
−
14
View file @
c9534b37
...
...
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ Practical Methods for Finding Pseudowalls}
\maketitle
\tableofcontents
\section
{
Introduction
}
\label
{
sec:intro
}
...
...
@@ -209,7 +211,33 @@ for the rank of $E$:
\section
{
B.Schmidt's Method
}
\section
{
Limitations
}
Goals:
\begin{itemize}
\item
intro
\item
link repo
\end{itemize}
\subsection
{
Strategy
}
Goals:
\begin{itemize}
\item
link repo
\item
Calc max destab rank
\item
Decrease mu(E) starting from mu(F) taking on all poss frac vals
\item
iterate over something else
\item
Stop when conditions fail
\item
method works same way for both rational beta
_{
-
}
but also for walls
larger than certain amount
\end{itemize}
\subsection
{
Limitations
}
Goals:
\begin{itemize}
\item
large rank forces mu to beta
_{
-
}
, so many vals of mu(E) checked
needlessly
\item
noticeably slow (show benchmark)
\end{itemize}
\section
{
Refinement
}
\label
{
sec:refinement
}
...
...
@@ -267,7 +295,9 @@ For the next subsections, we consider $q$ to be fixed with one of these values,
and we shall be varying
$
\chern
_
0
(
E
)
=
r
$
to see when certain inequalities fail.
\subsection
{
\subsection
{
Numerical Inequalities
}
\subsubsection
{
\texorpdfstring
{
$
\Delta
(
E
)
+
\Delta
(
G
)
\leq
\Delta
(
F
)
$
}{
...
...
@@ -390,7 +420,7 @@ In the case $\beta = \beta_{-}$ (or $\beta_{+}$) we have
$
\chern
^{
\beta
}_
2
(
F
)
=
0
$
,
so some of these expressions simplify.
\subsection
{
\subs
ubs
ection
{
\texorpdfstring
{
$
\Delta
(
E
)
\geq
0
$
}{
...
...
@@ -480,7 +510,7 @@ Notice that for $\beta = \beta_{-}$ (or $\beta_{+}$), that is when
$
\chern
^{
\beta
}_
2
(
F
)=
0
$
, the constant and linear terms match up with the ones
for the bound found for
$
d
$
in subsection
\ref
{
subsect-d-bound-bgmlv1
}
.
\subsection
{
\subs
ubs
ection
{
\texorpdfstring
{
$
\Delta
(
G
)
\geq
0
$
}{
...
...
@@ -642,14 +672,11 @@ $\chern^{\beta}_2(F) = 0$,
so some of these expressions simplify, and in particular, the constant and
linear terms match those of the other bounds in the previous subsections.
\subsection
{
Bounds on
\texorpdfstring
{$
r
$}{
r
}}
Now, the inequalities from the last three subsections will be used to find, for
each given
$
q
=
\chern
^{
\beta
}_
1
(
E
)
$
, how large
$
r
$
needs to be in order to leave
no possible solutions for
$
d
$
. At that point, there are no Chern characters
$
(
r,c,d
)
$
that satisfy all inequalities to give a pseudowall.
\subsubsection
{
All Bounds on
$
d
$
together
}
%% RECAP ON INEQUALITIES TOGETHER
\subsubsection
{
All circular pseudowalls left of vertical wall
}
%%%% RATIONAL BETA MINUS
\minorheading
{
Special Case: Rational
$
\beta
_{
-
}$}
Suppose we take
$
\beta
=
\beta
_{
-
}$
(so that
$
\chern
^{
\beta
}_
2
(
F
)=
0
$
)
in the previous subsections, to find all circular walls to the left of the
...
...
@@ -877,8 +904,16 @@ Some of the details around the associated numerics are explored next.
\label
{
fig:d
_
bounds
_
xmpl
_
gnrc
_
q
}
\end{figure}
\subsection
{
Bounds on Semistabilizer Rank
\texorpdfstring
{$
r
$}{
r
}}
Now, the inequalities from the above (TODO REF) will be used to find, for
each given
$
q
=
\chern
^{
\beta
}_
1
(
E
)
$
, how large
$
r
$
needs to be in order to leave
no possible solutions for
$
d
$
. At that point, there are no Chern characters
$
(
r,c,d
)
$
that satisfy all inequalities to give a pseudowall.
\subsubsection
{
All Semistabilizers Left of Vertical Wall for Rational Beta min
}
\minorheading
{
Rational
$
\beta\not
=
0
$}
The strategy here is similar to what was shown in (sect
\ref
{
sec:twisted-chern
}
),
% ref to Schmidt?
...
...
@@ -1135,7 +1170,7 @@ proof of theorem \ref{thm:rmax_with_uniform_eps}:
\begin{equation*}
d -
\frac
{
(
\aa
r + 2
\bb
)
\aa
}{
2n
^
2
}
\geq
\epsilon
_{
q,2
}
\geq
\epsilon
_{
q,1
}
0
\geq
\epsilon
_{
q,2
}
\geq
\epsilon
_{
q,1
}
>
0
\end{equation*}
Where
$
\epsilon
_{
q,
1
}$
and
$
\epsilon
_{
q,
2
}$
are defined as follows:
...
...
@@ -1252,7 +1287,26 @@ eps_k_i_subs = nu == (2*m*n^2)/delta
\egroup
% end scope where beta redefined to beta_{-}
\section
{
Conclusion
}
\subsubsection
{
All Semistabilizers Giving Sufficiently Large Circular Walls Left
of Vertical Wall
}
Goals:
\begin{itemize}
\item
refresher on strategy
\item
point out no need for rational beta
\item
calculate intersection of bounds?
\end{itemize}
\subsection
{
Irrational
$
\beta
_{
-
}$}
Goals:
\begin{itemize}
\item
Point out if only looking for sufficiently large wall, look at above
subsubsection
\item
Relate to Pell's equation through coordinate change?
\item
Relate to numerical condition described by Yanagida/Yoshioka
\end{itemize}
\newpage
\section
{
Appendix - SageMath code
}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment