Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9179ff76 authored by Luke Naylor's avatar Luke Naylor
Browse files

Second Bogomolov inequality

parent 8c79d043
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -230,6 +230,53 @@ This can be rearranged to express a bound on $d$ as follows:
\end{dmath}
\noindent
In the case $\beta = \beta_{-}$ (or $\beta_{+}$) this can be simplified.
\subsection{$\Delta(E) \geq 0$}
This condition expressed in terms of $R,C,D,r,c,d$ looks as follows:
\begin{sagesilent}
# First Bogomolov-Gieseker form expression that must be non-negative:
bgmlv2 = Δ(u)
\end{sagesilent}
\begin{equation}
\sage{0 <= bgmlv2.expand() }
\end{equation}
\noindent
Expressing $c$ in terms of $q$ as defined in (eqn \ref{eqn-cintermsofm})
we get the following:
\begin{sagesilent}
bgmlv2_with_q = bgmlv2.expand().subs(c == c_in_terms_of_q)
\end{sagesilent}
\begin{equation}
\sage{0 <= bgmlv2_with_q}
\end{equation}
\noindent
This can be rearranged to express a bound on $d$ as follows:
\begin{sagesilent}
bgmlv2_d_ineq = (
((0 <= bgmlv2_with_q)/2/r + d) # Rearrange for d
.expand()
)
bgmlv2_d_lowerbound = bgmlv2_d_ineq.rhs() # Keep hold of lower bound for d
\end{sagesilent}
\begin{equation}
\sage{bgmlv2_d_ineq}
\end{equation}
\noindent
In the case $\beta = \beta_{-}$ (or $\beta_{+}$) this can be simplified.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment